THERE’S humiliation and then there’s real humiliation.
While swimming in the local outdoor pool in Canberra, a guy swept past me
like a torpedo to my tugboat. I felt bad. I actually rocked in the water as he
swam by. But the feeling didn’t last long once I realised that the torpedo was
Alexander Popov, two-time Olympic gold medal winner and holder of the world
record for the 100 metres freestyle. In the next lane gleamed the menacing
shaven head of Popov’s training partner, Michael Klim, who has swum the fastest
time ever in the 100 metres butterfly. I had unwittingly crawled into part of
the pool where these elite athletes occasionally train for a change of scene
from the indoor pool at the nearby Australian Institute of Sport.
Popov seemed to slide effortlessly through the water, elbow bent overhead in
classic freestyle position, long arms slicing forward with elegant ease. In
contrast, Klim crashed ahead with his arms locked straight as they emerged from
the water in his trademark “windmill” version of the freestyle. Each man’s style
is unique, but both are world beaters. And both are the product of the
unorthodox ideas of the same coach, Gennadi Touretski.
Advertisement
Touretski, a colourful and sometimes controversial character, studies the
motion of fish and writes physics equations on the whiteboard of his poolside
office to explain the principles of hydrodynamics. His brand of science-based
training has done much to promote the idea that it is not raw power that makes
champion swimmers, but efficiency. Klim and Popov are taught to behave like
fish, to “feel” the water and glide through it.
Now a naturalised Australian, Touretski is a product of the old Soviet
system, in which as many as eight scientists would monitor the performance of
the national team. He is a former swimming champion with a degree in engineering
and training in biomechanics, biochemistry, fluid mechanics and sports
physiology. He is known for using unusual props to get his ideas across: he once
brought inflated condoms to the pool to show his fellow coaches the importance
of maintaining a rigid torso while kicking forward. When deflated, the condoms
flopped in the water; inflated, they skimmed across the surface with just a
light push.
Touretski’s swimmers swear by him. It was Touretski’s idea, for example, for
Klim to switch to the windmill style. “I’ve made straight personal bests ever
since he made me make this change,” Klim told me later. Popov is just as
enthusiastic: “He’s the reason I left Russia.” Popov and Klim have the status of
pop stars in Australia, while magazines and newspapers hail Touretski as the man
who transformed top-echelon swimming in Australia. But amid all the hoopla, the
question remains: how do Touretski and his swimmers do it?
The answers, say Touretski as he paces the poolside, lie partly in genetics
and partly in technique. Elite swimmers tend to be born with certain advantages,
such as superefficient metabolisms. Some long-distance swimmers, for example,
have cardiovascular systems capable of delivering twice as much oxygen to
starved muscle cells as the average fit young person, giving them a tremendous
advantage before even entering the pool.
Olympic swimmers also tend to be tall and long-limbed. When seen on land,
Touretski’s swimmers are as long and lanky as basketball players. Klim is 1.91
metres tall (6 feet 3 inches), while Popov, at 1.97 metres (6 feet 6 inches),
can touch the bottom of the deep end of the Canberra pool and still keep his
head above water. The pair are designed for swimming. Or, as Touretski told
them: “You have something given to you by God. You must develop it.” Fair
enough. But how?
There are two ways to swim faster, says Touretski: increase the force that
swimmers use to propel themselves through the water or decrease water
resistance. Both approaches come down to technique, but he thinks the second is
by far the best. To propel yourself through the water faster you might, for
example, increase your stroke rate. But there’s a problem here, Touretski says.
You’d soon run out of steam. He cites a passage from his favourite book,
Fish Swimmingby zoologist John Videler of the University of Groningen in
the Netherlands, which states that energy consumption in water increases as the
cube of the stroking rate. In other words, doubling the speed at which you move
your arms through the water takes eight times as much energy.
What’s more, increasing stroke rate inevitably means taking shorter strokes,
which is at odds with how most animals behave. When they want to move faster,
they increase the distance covered with each movement. Touretski points to video
clips for support: horses, Touretski points out, speed up by increasing the
distance they cover with every stride, not by increasing the number of strides
per second. Kangaroos do the same hopping on their two feet. Touretski believes
swimmers should do what animals do, stretching as far forward as possible to get
the longest pull with each stroke. Popov’s first gold medal in the 1992 Olympics
in Barcelona provided evidence to support this approach. When he beat the
American swimmer Matt Biondi, Popov covered 50 metres with just 33 strokes to
Biondi’s 36.
So if increasing stroke rate isn’t the answer, what about pulling harder and
bulldozing through the water? Until the 1980s, swimmers and their coaches
focused on power. They took inspiration from mechanical models such as
propellers and paddle wheels. The typical swimmer had shoulders like a Bulgarian
weightlifter, and the emphasis was on lots of long-distance training sessions,
according to renowned coach Cecil Colwin, author of Swimming into the 21st
Century. The science of biomechanics “has been incorrectly focused on
emulating the actions of mechanical propellers instead of . . . mechanisms more
akin to natural flight and fish propulsion”, he wrote.
Touretski agrees with Colwin, for reasons based on physics. Fluid dynamics
tells us that drag depends upon form and friction. Dolphins swim as fast as they
do, for example, because they have a streamlined shape and because their skin is
designed to reduce friction by stopping the formation of energy-sapping eddies
around their bodies (“Secrets of a perfect skin”, New Scientist, 18
January 1997, p28).
Making waves
Humans have neither of these advantages. But the real killer for competitive
swimmers is a third type of resistance that arises at the interface between air
and water—wave drag. Moving along the surface of the water inevitably
creates waves. Physically speaking, swimmers force a mass of water in front of
them to rise up against gravity. This not only robs swimmers of energy, but it
has a disproportionately greater effect the faster they go.
The problem is that wave drag increases as the cube of any increase in
swimming speed. And it gets worse if a swimmer makes jerky or uneven movements,
either bouncing in the water or moving from side to side, because this wastes
still more energy making waves. Because of this, Touretski believes that trying
to increase speed by propelling yourself harder through the water is pointless
beyond a certain point. “More propulsive force will only produce higher waves,
not higher velocities,” he says.
If you can’t beat water into submission, Touretski argues that it’s better to
learn how to avoid its obstructive influence. For a start, reducing friction
with the water is important. This is one reason why Klim shaves his head.
Form—or shape—is also a factor. For swimmers this means streamlining
themselves with tricks such as pushing the head and chest down into the water,
and rolling from side to side with each stroke, to present a narrower profile.
To avoid wave drag, Touretski urges swimmers to eliminate jerkiness in their
stroke. (One of the other curious consequences of wave drag is that it penalises
short swimmers more than it does their taller rivals.)
To achieve a reduced resistance technique, Touretski’s swimmers are trained
to improve their balance, locomotion and “feel” of the water. The emphasis
during training is on quality of performance rather than mileage. His idea is
that with constant repetition, precisely practised movements become second
nature—like reflexes.
To work properly this training method demands meticulous attention to detail.
“If you can’t do it exactly right, don’t do it at all,” Touretski says. He’d
rather have his swimmers do a few movements properly than do a lot of movements
incorrectly. Touretski and his swimmers talk in terms of “muscle memory”. “If
you’re not doing the right type of training or not doing it correctly, then
you’re not storing the right information,” says Klim. “You want to do as much of
your swimming as possible with the correct strokes.”
So much time is spent on proper technique that by Olympic standards, Klim,
Popov and the rest of Touretski’s squad have relatively leisurely
workouts—though they still swim about 70 kilometres a week. To outsiders,
his methods appear odd. American coach, Bill Irwin, once told a reporter: “Popov
does long sets with meticulously precise strokes and a consistently beautiful
flow. In three weeks, I never saw him do a single lap that looked hard.”
Slowly does it
Part of what he saw is Touretski’s “superslow swimming” method. Touretski
demonstrates by walking across his office in exaggerated slow motion. By moving
extremely slowly, he has to concentrate on the exact placement of each muscle.
Balance becomes imperative. “People are more wobbly when moving very slowly and
they have to constantly shift weight to get their balance right,” he says. The
same applies in the pool, and when swimmers can travel smoothly at a very slow
speed, they can move more smoothly at high speed.
Superslow swimming also forces swimmers to concentrate on extending their
arms as far as possible, to get maximum range on each stroke. And it improves a
swimmer’s ability to relax at higher speed. When you absolutely know that your
hands and feet will be in the right place at the right time, there are fewer
frantic actions and less wasted energy during a race. Relaxation is often
overlooked, but the great American swimmer Johnny Weissmuller once said that
“the greatest secret of freestyle swimming is relaxation at top speed”.
(Weissmuller is best remembered today for his Hollywood portrayals of Tarzan,
but until Popov came along, he was the only swimmer to win gold medals for the
100 metres freestyle in two consecutive Olympics.) Touretski elaborates: “Not
all muscles are switched on at the same time. There’s a wave of muscles
contracting or relaxing simultaneously.” Learning to relax the muscles that are
not in use saves energy and staves off fatigue.
Training at slow speed also helps the swimmer hone the all-important
intuitive “feel” of the water to anticipate, control and manipulate its flow.
Swimmers get quite mystical when describing this ability, like artists
describing “a good eye” for painting. To a swimmer, “feel” lets you know when
you’ve properly caught the water with your palm and pulled your body forward
with minimal resistance.
If superslow swimming does not help to develop this sense, Touretski tries
the opposite approach, using his towing machine. This pulls swimmers through the
water at high speed, so they get a heightened sensation of what happens when
they position their arms and legs properly. It’s like holding your arm out of
the window of a moving car—when your palm is held vertically you feel the
wind resistance pushing it back. Rotate it 90 degrees and your hand knifes
through the air.
Touretski’s methods are intended to optimise what he calls the “three Rs”:
stroke range, relaxation and rhythm. Rhythm is important for reducing jerkiness
in the water. When a freestyle swimmer’s hand digs into the water his or her
body speeds up, but when it is withdrawn the body slows down. Like a
one-cylinder engine, this results in uneven propulsion. The larger the changes,
the more energy is wasted.
To move at a constant speed, one arm should always dig into the water as the
other comes out, so that the motion is more like that generated by a
two-cylinder engine, in which one piston drives the engine while the other
recovers. To get their arms moving in synchrony, Touretski has his swimmers
practise a “kayak manoeuvre” in which they stand on the poolside with a
double-bladed kayak paddle and take an imaginary trip. Popov demonstrates how,
as he paddles, one arm is always doing the opposite of the other. Once again,
Touretski’s swimmers drill in this manner until the technique becomes second
nature.
These unusual drills and training methods seem to pay off. Touretski’s
swimmers don’t waste much energy in creating waves. Besides the evidence of all
his success, a study by Sergei Kolmogorov, head scientist of the Russian team,
has shown that Popov’s smooth technique allows him to consume 30 per cent less
energy than other swimmers moving at the same speed.
Touretski hopes to improve his swimmers’ technique still further. “I think
Michael [Klim] will look better over time. He’s still learning, still growing.
I’m fighting for beautiful technique,” he says. “Beauty and perfection are quite
Dz.”
Further reading: Fish Swimming by John Videler, Chapman & Hall (1993).
Swimming into the 21st Century by Cecil Colwin, Human Kinetics (1992).
“Preparation for sprint events” by Gennadi Touretski, Swimnews Online at
http:www.swimnews. com/Mag/1998/MayMag98/sprintprep.shtml