ҹ1000

Leaving his brain behind

Bob Johnstone views working in Japan

AS a job description, “brain builder” would seem pretty hard to beat. Yet
Australian researcher Hugo de Garis has quit his position as head of the Brain
Builder Group at Japan’s Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute (ATR) at
a critical point in his work. He has just finished constructing a machine that
attempts to model the function of the human brain.

His machine, completed last month, is based on neural network technology.
Over the next few months, about 75 million artificial neurons will “evolve”
inside the flexible computer chips known as field-programmable gate arrays into
about 64 000 functional modules. These will then be assembled into a (human
defined) brain. To show off its capabilities, later next year the artificial
brain will be used to control the behaviour of a purpose-built robot kitten.
Lots of purring and whirring.

Whether it will work or not is anybody’s guess. Plenty of scientists dismiss
de Garis’ predictions as unrealistic. But whatever happens, de Garis won’t be
around to see it. Ostensibly he is leaving because his division, Evolutionary
Systems, was axed due to the poor performance of the Japanese economy. In fact,
de Garis says, he had had enough of working in Japan.

His story is a cautionary tale for foreign researchers. It begins in the late
’80s when de Garis, with many others, thought Japan would overtake the US to
become the world’s number one economy by the Year 2000. He also reasoned that
because of its wealth, Japan would be able to attract the best researchers on
the planet.

So, in 1992 De Garis took up a post-doctoral position at the Japanese
government’s Electrotechnical Laboratory in Tsukuba Science City. The following
year, he was hired at an attractive salary by ATR, on the strength of a
presentation at an artificial life conference of his vision of building a
brain.

ATR was set up with funds from the privatisation of Nippon Telegraph &
Telephone. (Can you imagine the Howard government proposing to use some of the
proceeds of selling off Telstra for such a purpose?) It is a focal point of
Kansai Science City, at the centre of a triangle defined by the cities of Osaka,
Kyoto and Nara. Unfortunately, just as the project was getting underway, the
bubble that was Japan’s economy burst. Many of the proposed labs were never
built, leaving ATR in splendid isolation.

De Garis went to ATR with a dream. He hoped Japan eventually would invest in
a major national brain building project that would be equivalent in size and
energy to NASA, and would rank with putting a man on the moon.

But the national project never materialised and de Garis found ATR a bitter
disappointment. “The intellectual atmosphere was sterile,” he says, “there were
no seminars, no groups, no-one to really brainstorm with—one person per
project—and no synergy.”

Over the years De Garis became very unhappy with Japan in general. “It’s a
culture where criticism is taboo, hence there is no real grass-roots democracy
nor intellectual life,” he complains, “I’m a passionate intellectual, so I
withered there.” In 1996, in an attempt to stimulate debate, de Garis posted
some critical essays on his Japanese website. His efforts were not appreciated,
and he was nearly fired as a result.

Such complaints of isolation and frustration have been common since Japanese
laboratories began hiring Western researchers in the ’80s.

At least for de Garis, the story has a happy ending, or a new beginning. He
has moved to Starlab, a privately owned institute based in Brussels. There he
will work on the next-generation, billion-neuron brain. At Starlab, other
“creative crazies” are working on topics such as time travel, faster than light
travel, nanotechnology, quantum computing and DNA computing. De Garis should fit
right in.