THE protection the BCG vaccine provides against tuberculosis is notoriously
poor. But it could hold the key to a vaccine against asthma, which now affects
one in seven children in the West.
Klaus Joseph Erb’s team at the University of Würzburg in Germany gave
mice nasal sprays containing the bacterium used in the BCG vaccine. When they
later exposed the mice to the egg-white protein ovalbumin, which usually gives
them asthma-like symptoms, their lungs remained healthy.
The tests provide further support for the hygiene hypothesis, which blames
over-cleanliness for the inexorable rise in asthma and other autoimmune diseases
in the West. According to this theory, exposure to common soil bacteria shifts
the immune system’s reaction to allergens from the Th2 response that causes the
symptoms of allergies to the less harmful Th1 response.
(New Scientist, 18 July 1998, p 26).
Advertisement
These soil bacteria are closely related to the TB bug, and observations in
Africa have suggested that TB and its relatives can also have a protective
effect. So Erb’s team reasoned that BCG, a mild strain of the bacterium that
causes TB in cows, might also protect against asthma when sprayed into the
lungs.
“The biggest surprise was that the mycobacteria didn’t have to be alive to
cause the effect,” says Erb. Only injections of live BCG can protect people
against TB.
Crucially, his team also showed that the balance had shifted away from the
Th2 response. So-called T helper 2 (Th2) white blood cells had vanished from the
mice’s lungs. Also banished were eosinophils, cells that aggravate asthma by
releasing histamine.
In their place, Erb found high levels of interferon-gamma, a messenger
substance that he thinks excludes the Th2 cells. “It could be the signal saying:
`Don’t come in’, or `Don’t stay’,” he says.
But both the live and killed versions of BCG caused lung inflammation in the
mice, which would be unacceptable in people. “The last thing you should put into
the lung of an asthmatic is something that causes even more inflammation,” Erb
says. “The trick is to find which components of the vaccines do the trick so you
still get the benefits without any side effects.”
So he and his colleagues are testing fragments of the dead bacteria to see if
any of them protect against asthma without causing inflammation. Most promising,
he believes, are “CpG motifs”—slugs of bacterial DNA unusually rich in the
nucleotide bases guanine and cytosine that provoke a strong immune response.
Other groups are also developing asthma vaccines. SR Pharma of London is
already carrying out trials with a heat-killed soil bacterium, Mycobacterium
vaccae, which is injected into the skin. Initial results suggest it does
reduce the severity of asthma and eczema in patients. But a vaccine that can be
safely delivered to the lungs might be even more effective.
Graham Rook of University College London, a cofounder of SR Pharma, adds that
the focus of research is shifting away from simply trying to alter the Th2/Th1
balance. His and other groups are studying regulatory T cells that can
completely block both responses.
-
More at:
Vaccine (vol 20, p 1532)