
Update: Zoltán Takáts has now joined Jeremy Nicholson’s team at Imperial College London. Working together, the group have tested the smart knife in action 81 times on people with cancer. The tool correctly identified both healthy and cancerous tissue, matching the post-operative histological diagnosis in all trials ().
Original article, published 2 February 2011
THE smell of burnt flesh rises in the operating theatre and the smoke from vaporised tissue is sucked away. But these fumes are not channelled out through the ventilation system. Instead, they are diverted into a machine that tells the surgeon exactly what is being cut into, guiding the rest of the operation. This is “smart surgeryâ€, and it holds the potential to transform medicine.
Advertisement
Timely tissue analysis is also high on the agenda outside of the operating theatre. When confronted with an ambiguous lump during a hospital appointment, a doctor’s normal port of call is the histologist – a laboratory scientist who identifies tissue samples using a microscope. The process tends to take about 40 minutes, and is subject to human error and variability. To standardise and speed up tissue identification, and his colleagues at Imperial College London have brought nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy – a chemistry-lab staple – into St Mary’s Hospital in London. “This is the first NMR spectrometer in a hospital in the world,†says Nicholson. The idea is that the machine can provide an accurate read-out of the molecular make-up of a pinhead-sized tissue sample in mere minutes.
“The machine provides an accurate read-out of the molecules in a pinhead-sized tissue sampleâ€
NMR spectroscopy is most commonly used in chemistry to understand protein structures and chemical reactions. It utilises a property of the nuclei of different molecules that causes them to behave differently in a magnetic field: each absorbs radio waves at characteristic frequencies, enabling the machine to identify all the molecules in a sample.
“By using it in a hospital, we’re looking at [a diagnosis] in about 10 minutes,†says , a surgeon involved in the project.
The technique could also cut down on costs, says Kinross. “The machine costs roughly around £200,000, but the cost of each analysis is very low,†he says, “and histologists are very expensive.â€
The next step is to take the technique into surgical practice. Figuring out whether a lump is benign or a cancerous tumour, or where cancerous tissue stops or starts, can be a tricky business for a surgeon at the operating table. “An inflammatory mass can look and feel the same as a cancer,†says Kinross. “In those cases you perform the safest operation for the patient, and that might mean an extensive resection.â€
If a surgeon needs to identify a particular tissue, the operation is put on hold for the 40 minutes it takes a histologist to analyse a sample. “The surgeons just stand around and tap their feet while the patient is left open on the operating table,†says Kinross.
But what if surgeons could immediately work out what type of tissue they are about to dissect? at the University of Giessen in Germany have adapted another kind of spectrometer in Debrecen, Hungary, to do just that.
Surgeons rarely use a simple steel blade in theatre. Instead, a range of cutting tools are used which generate heat to both cut tissue and reseal blood vessels. A common method is electrosurgery, whereby a person lies on a giant flat electrode, and the surgeon cuts into them using a sharp electrode shaped like a knife (pictured). The electric current between the two electrodes produces heat at the point where the knife’s tip touches the tissue.
“During the surgery there is smoke and a smell of burnt flesh,†says Takáts. This smoke is normally pumped out through a ventilation system, but his group redirects the fumes into a mass spectrometer (see diagram).
As the smoke is sucked up, the small molecules are separated from the larger pieces of tar, made from burnt flesh, by virtue of their different speeds through the tube. The small molecules then enter a mass spectrometer, which Nicholson describes as “an extremely accurate weighing machine for moleculesâ€.
When tissue is vaporised, its individual molecules become charged. In the spectrometer, the charged molecules are accelerated in a vacuum by magnets. The larger a molecule is, the slower it travels, so the molecules are weighed – and identified – by their arrival time at the analyser at the end of the machine.
The information collected – the sample’s spectrum – can then be matched against a database of spectra of other tissue samples to pin down the tissue type, which is presented on a computer screen. Takáts’s growing database contains about 16,000 spectra, which can identify a range of healthy and cancerous tissues.
All of this takes a mere 0.9 seconds, but by improving the algorithm used to check spectra against the database, the team predicts it can lower this even further, to about 0.2 seconds – effectively instantaneous.
Takáts’s group are part-way through a clinical trial comparing patient outcomes in mass spectrometer-aided surgery with normal procedures. “We haven’t yet compared them systematically but one thing’s for sure – this mass spectrometer-based tissue identification surgery decreases the surgery duration and invasiveness,†says Takáts.
The group is now looking for spectra that identify tissue surrounding a tumour. In most cases surgeons want to avoid cutting directly into a tumour, which could fragment and spread through the body. Ideally, surgeons would have a warning signal when cutting close to the cancer, enabling them to cut around it, says Takáts, who hopes to find markers of inflammation that signpost nearby tumour territory.
The opposite is true for brain surgery. “Here, the surgeons need to be alerted when the healthy brain tissue is being cut,†says Takáts, who has just begun trialling his technique in people with brain cancer. “They cannot cut around the tumour as they would be cutting into functional brain tissue. Millimetres count.â€
The technology could also be used to enhance surgical robots. “What we’re looking at is biochemically aware robots,†says Kinross. “I can’t think why you’d spend all that time and money to build a robot and not integrate into it a sensing tool which improves decision-making.â€
Both research groups are hopeful of transforming surgery and hospital treatment. , an analytical chemist at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, says he is cautiously optimistic. “Takáts has made an important advance in applying this technology to surgical smoke,†he says. “It’s a clever way to go.â€