午夜福利1000集合

Flop, an exhibition about failure, shows the joy and pain of mistakes

From the accidental creation of Silly Putty to an abandoned attempt to build a universal language, University College London's latest exhibition, Flop, offers new ways to look at failure
Silly Putty
The failure to make synthetic rubber created one of the world鈥檚 most enduring toys, Silly Putty
Matt Clayton

The Octagon

University College London (Until 10 April 2020)

QUITTING your job? Then do remember to clear out your locker. One former employee of University College London left a bottle of home-made plum brandy in a drawer. The macerated plum was eventually discovered, mulled over (sorry), misidentified as a testicle (species unknown) and added to the university鈥檚 collection.

It is this selection of paintings, prints, objects and medical exhibits that provides the items for Flop, taking place in UCL鈥檚 tiny Octagon gallery. This isn鈥檛 so much an exhibition as a series of provocations. A notice by the last case asks us to share our failures on a postcard 鈥渟o we can all start learning from each other鈥檚 mistakes鈥.

What is a failure? Do they exist outside human judgement? A favourite undergraduate philosophy question is 鈥渃an animals have accidents?鈥. People certainly can: one of the more gruesome exhibits is a human heart, fatally punctured by a sword swallower鈥檚 blade.

How we define failure depends on changing needs and circumstances.

There was a time, not very long ago, when the plethora of human languages seemed indicative of some deep, historical failure to establish amity across our species. There is a fascinating page on display from an essay by the 17th-century clergyman John Wilkins, whose Royal Society project attempted to establish an analytical language that would let people communicate despite not sharing the same spoken language. It foundered because the Royal Society couldn鈥檛 agree how many essential concepts existed in the world.

Now that we have developed artificially intelligent agents capable of translating spoken speech in real time, we find failure in the reduction of linguistic diversity. We bemoan lost languages (3000 have perished since 1900) and mourn the cultural deficit left.

Can objects fail? Only in the sense that they fail to perform an expected action. Silly Putty, a perennially popular toy, was the result of a failed attempt to produce synthetic rubber during the second world war.

If these examples of failure feel a bit tenuous, well, that is the point Flop wants to make: what is interesting is how we deal with failures, not how we define them. As the introductory material explains: 鈥淧erhaps contrasting failure with success is the real problem. If every activity has to end in either one or the other, it denies the nuanced and messy complexities of life.鈥

Topics: Exhibition / History