Twelve months ago, Britain promised to green the corridors of power.
The pledge to make Whitehall environment friendly was a key point in the
country’s first White Paper on the environment, published last September.
This week Michael Heseltine, the Secretary of State for the Environment,
issued a progress report. Behind the gloss of sweeping government activity
lie gaping deficiencies.
Heseltine, despite being a gardener and bird-watcher, has had little
time for green issues since being recycled as environment secretary last
year. The poll tax and inner cities have kept him busy elsewhere. As a result,
his record on environmental issues is patchy and the momentum built up by
the White Paper has been allowed to run down.
For example, earlier in the summer, widespread problems were revealed
in an analysis commissioned by the government on Britain’s implementation
of a European Community directive on environmental projects. It found that
the professionals who are supposed to understand the system do not know
how it works. Regulations are being applied incorrectly.
And last week, MPs on the House of Commons Select Committee on the Environment
highlighted glaring deficiencies in the way waste is handled. There is a
dearth of basic statistics. Policy is operating largely on a wing and a
prayer.
Advertisement
Worst of all is the sorry saga of John Major’s glib creation of a central
agency along the lines of the Environmental Protection Agency in the US.
A year ago a British ‘EPA’ was not an environmental imperative. But in July
the Prime Minister found himself without any initiatives to announce in
his first major green speech. Enter the EPA, British-style.
Since then all hell has broken loose. Facing a shotgun marriage with
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Pollution, the National Rivers Authority has
kicked up a fuss. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and
Food has fought a civil war with the Department of the Environment over
who picks up the pieces after the NRA’s demise. Heseltine’s department has
been left looking silly.
Making environmental policy on the hoof impresses no one. If Heseltine
wants the government’s environment credentials to be taken seriously at
the forthcoming general election he will have to demonstrate this week that
the reorganisation of the environmental regulators has been put firmly back
on course.
In the light of its own failures, it is hard for the DoE to convert
the rest of the government. The publication on Monday of the department’s
guide to policy appraisal – intended to educate middle-ranking civil servants
everywhere in thinking green – is well meaning but will be ineffectual.
Sceptics in other departments only have to point to the DoE’s own shortcomings.
It would be too much to expect the DoE to turn the machinery of government
green in a single year. But little noticeable progress has been made. Given
the department’s own failings, this is not so surprising. The way forward,
as the Secretary of State surely knows, is to start by cultivating his own
garden.
![Astronomers have long known that understanding how star clusters come to be is key to unlocking other secrets of galactic evolution. Stars form in clusters, created when clouds of gas collapse under gravity. As more and more stars are born in a collapsing cloud, strong stellar winds, harsh ultraviolet radiation and the supernova explosions of massive stars eventually disperse the cloud, and their light can bear down on other star-forming regions in the galaxy. This process is called stellar feedback, and it means that most of the gas in a galaxy never gets used for star formation. Researching how star clusters develop can answer questions about star formation at a galactic scale. Now, the state of the art has been further developed with both Hubble and Webb working together to provide a broad-spectrum view of thousands of young star clusters. An international team of astronomers has pored over images of four nearby galaxies from the FEAST observing programme (#1783), trying to solve this mystery. Their results show that it is the most massive star clusters that clear away their gaseous shroud the fastest, and begin lighting their galaxy the earliest. The team identified nearly 9000 star clusters in the four galaxies in different evolutionary stages: young clusters just starting to emerge from their natal clouds of gas, clusters that had partially dispersed the gas (both from Webb images), and fully unobstructed clusters visible in optical light (found in Hubble images). With Webb???s ability to peer inside the gas clouds, they were able to then estimate the mass and age of each cluster from its light spectrum. This image shows a section of one of the spiral arms of Messier 51 (M51), one of the four galaxies studied in this work, as seen by Webb???s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam). The thick clumps of star-forming gas are shown here in red and orange, representing infrared light emitted by ionised gas, dust grains, and complex molecules such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Within these gas complexes, each tens or hundreds of light years across, Webb reveals the dense, extremely bright clusters of massive stars that have just recently formed. The countless stars strewn across the arm of the galaxy, many of which would be invisible to our eyes behind layers of dust, are also laid bare in infrared light. [Image description: A large, long portion of one of the spiral arms in galaxy M51. Red-orange, clumpy filaments of gas and dust that stretch in a chain from left to right comprise the arm. Shining cyan bubbles light up parts of the gas clouds from within, and gaps expose bright star clusters in these bubbles as glowing white dots. The whole image is dotted with small stars. A faint blue glow around the arm colours the otherwise dark background.]](https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/13114322/SEI_296271016.jpg)


