Sociologist Steven Yearley takes a long look at the way in which ideas such
as “think globally, act locally” spring from a mistaken assumption that we all
mean the same thing when we discuss the world or global problems. In Sociology,
Environmentalism, Globalization (Sage, £12.95, ISBN 0 8039 7517 1), he
asserts that in capturing the moral high ground by claiming the planet for
themselves, environmentalists are ignoring the fragmented nature of many of the
problems they want to resolve. And the emotional construct that hangs round the
notion that we are all global now, united in defence of planet Earth, obscures
the real forces acting to damage the environment. Even the role of science as
arbiter of quarrels about pollution, for example, is questioned.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Life
New Scientist recommends a brilliant take on the evolution of birds
Culture

Environment
Striking photos show how sands are encroaching on oases in the Sahara
Regulars

Comment
Think you have a good sense of humour? So do most people…
Regulars

Comment
Sci-fi horror film Backrooms is a triumph for its 20-year-old director
Culture
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
Mysterious ‘cold blob’ in the Atlantic suggests the AMOC is weakening
3
Millions of fossil whale bones found in deep-ocean ‘necropolis’
4
Why we should all take quantum physics extremely personally
5
A nuclear war between India and Pakistan could destroy the ozone layer
6
Hundreds of new moons are revealing our solar system's violent history
7
Robots are about to overtake armed soldiers as the deciders of war
8
Solar farm on the ocean outperforms land-based solar in Taiwan
9
Why you need to future-proof your brain in middle age and how to start
10
What to read this week: Katrina Manson's terrifying Project Maven