In Science as a Questioning Process (Institute of Physics, £20, ISBN 0
7503 0369 7), astrophysicist Nigel Sanitt puts forward a stiff new test for
scientific theories: stated simply, any theory worth the name has to answer more
questions than it raises. Using a process he calls zetetic analysis, he shows,
for instance, that Darwinism was not a proper theory, though Neo-Darwinism is.
For good measure, he crams in some reflections on the lack of certainty in
science and its close resemblance to literature.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion
3
Understanding anorexia’s grip on the brain could unlock new therapies
4
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
5
Hundreds of new moons are revealing our solar system's violent history
6
Wolves seen hunting European bison in rare camera-trap recording
7
Mysterious ‘cold blob’ in the Atlantic suggests the AMOC is weakening
8
El Niño has started and the weather could get weird
9
A nuclear war between India and Pakistan could destroy the ozone layer
10
Dramatic photo of ibis being guided to their winter homes wins award
