The US may get a more accurate census in 2010. The Bureau of the Census has
been given the go-ahead to experiment with statistical sampling as a way of
accounting for the millions of people missed out by conventional counts. Census
officials say that making statistical adjustments based on numbers of people
already counted is the best way to improve accuracy, but Republican members of
Congress —who stand to lose from the redrawing of Congressional districts
if the missing millions are included—dismiss the idea as unconstitutional
(This Week, 21 June, p 12).
A compromise recently thrashed out bars the adoption
of statistical sampling for the 2000 census—but leaves the door open to
its use later on.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
Understanding anorexia’s grip on the brain could unlock new therapies
3
El Niño has started and the weather could get weird
4
Why we should all take quantum physics extremely personally
5
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
6
Unpicking endometriosis reveals how it affects more than the pelvis
7
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion
8
Millions of fossil whale bones found in deep-ocean ‘necropolis’
9
Mysterious ‘cold blob’ in the Atlantic suggests the AMOC is weakening
10
Hundreds of new moons are revealing our solar system's violent history



