According to Percy Seymour, it’s an error to confuse serious research into
astrology with the cheap jack astrological columns in the press, and more
foolish still to believe that astrologers can predict future events. His
contention that there may, nevertheless, be some grain of truth in astrology
takes him ranging over wide areas, from biological clocks to magnetism,
gravitation to animal navigation. Whether it’s worth following these divagations
will depend whether you believe his arguments in the introduction. Scientific
Basis of Astrology is published by Foulsham, £ 9.99, ISBN 057202181X.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first
News
Mind
Where do you think your ‘self’ is? Your answer is revealing
Comment
Mind
Vocal fry is more common in men, actually, find scientists
News
Environment
Will burying dead trees after a wildfire keep their carbon locked up?
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
2
Rebooting stem cells builds aged muscles and assists injury recovery
3
Neanderthals treated a dental cavity by drilling into the tooth
4
PCOS has been officially renamed PMOS, and it’s a momentous move
5
3 things you need to know about quantum computers, from an expert
6
Vocal fry is more common in men, actually, find scientists
7
Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer
8
Asteroid set to fly very close to Earth
9
Melting of Greenland ice sheet could release methane 'fire ice'
10
Will burying dead trees after a wildfire keep their carbon locked up?
