The world is bigger than we are. Some bits of it are sufficiently stable
for us to make sciences out of them. Others are slippy, and our approaches are
at best alchemical. When it comes to interpreting our past, alchemy is probably
the best we can do. Read Richard Evans’s In Defence of History, a hearty
apologia for a problematic discipline. Published by Granta, £8.99, ISBN
1862071047.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Advertorial
The defence sector can’t adopt a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to AI
Advertising
Advertorial
Why the future of defence is drone tech and distributed edge computing
Advertising
Advertorial
The future of defence lies in transatlantic industrial partnerships
Advertising
Advertorial
The biggest defence risk is a lack of integration, not technology
Advertising
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
A quantum state that lasts forever may finally be within our grasp
2
Most portable air conditioners suck – but there's an easy fix
3
We've found a mysterious substance on Titan and Pluto
4
Can prebiotics, probiotics or postbiotics help your ageing microbiome?
5
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
6
Has the answer to life's origins been hiding in our cells all along?
7
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
8
Faecal transplant makes the brains of old mice act young again
9
Almost the whole of Japan moved eastward after 2011 earthquake
10
Chronic inflammation messes with your mind. Here's how to calm it
