A judge in Philadelphia has ruled against a law that makes it a crime to put
“harmful” material on the Internet where children can see it. Congress passed
the Child Online Protection Act last year, requiring anyone who puts potentially
harmful material on the Net to guarantee that only adults can see it, for
instance by demanding credit card details. But Lowell Reed, a federal district
judge hearing a suit against the law, ruled last week that it would restrict the
constitutional right to free speech among adults.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
Woman with Alzheimer's starts conversing again after taking psilocybin
News
Life
New-to-science spider builds trap that flings ants into the air
News
ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
How menopause radically changes the brain – and what happens after
Features
Mind
‘Fusogenic’ neurosurgery let paralysed pigs walk again – are we next?
Comment
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
How menopause radically changes the brain – and what happens after
2
Faecal transplant makes the brains of old mice act young again
3
Woman with Alzheimer's starts conversing again after taking psilocybin
4
New-to-science spider builds trap that flings ants into the air
5
Most portable air conditioners suck – but there's an easy fix
6
The surprising ways your brain changes from your 20s to your 40s
7
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
8
We've found a mysterious substance on Titan and Pluto
9
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
10
People training new AI models admit they just get chatbots to do it
