Astronomers last week lost their battle to keep the Compton Gamma Ray
Observatory aloft when NASA decided to dump the telescope in the Pacific on 3
June. The nine-year-old spacecraft lost one gyroscope in December. Although the
two remaining gyros can safely control the telescope’s descent into a remote
piece of ocean, if another one fails NASA is worried that it could not determine
the 15-tonne observatory’s landing place. Some astronomers are angry that their
proposal for a safe no-gyro re-entry was ignored. “Disgust is a word that comes
to mind,” says William Paciesas of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Advertorial
The defence sector can’t adopt a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to AI
Advertising
Advertorial
Why the future of defence is drone tech and distributed edge computing
Advertising
Advertorial
The future of defence lies in transatlantic industrial partnerships
Advertising
Advertorial
The biggest defence risk is a lack of integration, not technology
Advertising
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Faecal transplant makes the brains of old mice act young again
2
Can prebiotics, probiotics or postbiotics help your ageing microbiome?
3
Most portable air conditioners suck – but there's an easy fix
4
A quantum state that lasts forever may finally be within our grasp
5
We've found a mysterious substance on Titan and Pluto
6
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
7
Almost the whole of Japan moved eastward after 2011 earthquake
8
Has the answer to life's origins been hiding in our cells all along?
9
Global map reveals the vast scale of underground fungal networks
10
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
