Only “minimal” progress has been made towards reforming the overburdened
system in the US for protecting people who are the subjects of research, says a
government report released last week. American studies are vetted by local
review boards. But two years ago, a high-profile review concluded that these
panels of volunteers weren’t up to the job
(New Scientist, 20 June 1998, p 3).
Officials at the Food and Drug Administration and the National
Institutes of ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ say that they have been working to solve the problems, but
the new report suggests that Congress may have to intervene.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Technology
NHS England rushes to hide software over AI hacking fears
News

ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
Comment

Life
Oak trees use delaying tactics to thwart hungry caterpillars
News

Environment
Will Colombia summit kick-start the end of the fossil fuel era?
Analysis
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
We have figured out a new way to send messages into the past
2
Thought-provoking photographs capture what it feels like to have ADHD
3
Why the keto diet could be a revolutionary way to treat mental illness
4
Human heads have changed shape a lot in the past 100 years
5
Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?
6
We may finally have a cure for many different autoimmune conditions
7
100-year-old assumption about the universe may soon be overturned
8
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
9
Weird 'transdimensional' state of matter is neither 2D nor 3D
10
Doubts cast over 'wild' claim that magnetic control can turn on genes