Television and newspaper reports of new medications often ignore the drugs’
drawbacks and exaggerate their benefits, according to a study of 180 newspaper
stories and 27 TV reports on an osteoporosis drug, a cholesterol-lowering
medication and aspirin. Fewer than half of the reports mentioned the drugs’ side
effects, and 40 per cent did not provide any quantitative evidence of their
benefits (The New England Journal of Medicine, vol 342, p 1645).
“Editors want the medical miracle,” says Ray Moynihan, a medical reporter who
initiated the study while on a fellowship at Harvard Medical School in Boston.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Humans
Iron Age Britons may have removed the brains of the dead
News

Life
Frozen squirrel scat preserves ancient DNA from hundreds of species
News

Environment
The last-ditch plan to save coral reefs from utter destruction
Features

Earth
Dinosaur-killing asteroid impact site stayed hot for millions of years
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Why we should all take quantum physics extremely personally
2
The last-ditch plan to save coral reefs from utter destruction
3
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
4
Dinosaur-killing asteroid impact site stayed hot for millions of years
5
Understanding anorexia’s grip on the brain could unlock new therapies
6
What really happened when ancient humans migrated out of Africa
7
Alice Roberts: 'We are fundamentally, at the end of the day, animals'
8
Why you need to future-proof your brain in middle age and how to start
9
Flood of AI 'garbage' is pushing open-source developers to the limit
10
There are five types of sleep – here's what that means for your health