You may find perfumed socks an indispensable luxury, but Steen Gade, head of
the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, thinks they are a pain in the neck.
“They undoubtedly add colour to life for some people,” he says, but his agency
faces the dilemma of how to regulate thousands of untested chemicals in products
that might harm human health or the environment. He believes regulators should
apply an “unnecessariness principle”, to dispense with chemicals that “make no
difference to how the products work”. You can let him know what you think at
www.mst.dk/debat/emner.asp?g=10.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion
3
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
4
Understanding anorexia’s grip on the brain could unlock new therapies
5
Why we should all take quantum physics extremely personally
6
El Niño has started and the weather could get weird
7
Unpicking endometriosis reveals how it affects more than the pelvis
8
Ditching cigarettes for vapes may curb the cancer benefits of quitting
9
Mysterious ‘cold blob’ in the Atlantic suggests the AMOC is weakening
10
You can upgrade your immune system, but not in the way you think



