THESE have been a wild few days for biomedicine. At the National Academy of
Sciences in Washington DC, Italian fertility specialist Severino Antinori and
his colleagues defended their plans to clone a human, facing a hostile audience.
And over at the White House, President George W. Bush relaxed his opposition to
the use of federal funds for research on human stem cells
(see “Clone encounters”
and “Two cheers”).
Both events signal changes in thinking about the most controversial issues in
biomedicine. Arguments that present absolute moral rights are giving way to
considerations of the common good. The influence of…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
Smart underwear detects lactose intolerance by tracking your farts
News

Environment
2026 will be the hottest year on record, leading scientist predicts
News

Technology
NHS England rushes to hide software over AI hacking fears
News

ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
Comment
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Human heads have changed shape a lot in the past 100 years
2
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
3
The rings of Uranus are even stranger than we thought
4
Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?
5
We may finally have a cure for many different autoimmune conditions
6
We have figured out a new way to send messages into the past
7
Why dinosaurs lived much more complex lives than we thought
8
An unorthodox version of quantum theory could reveal what reality is
9
The best new science fiction books of May 2026
10
What to read this week: The 21st Century Brain by Hannah Critchlow