Eight-year-old kids can identify Pokémon “species” from the card-trading game more easily than they can name their local wildlife. Zoologist Andrew Balmford and his colleagues at Cambridge University showed more than 100 children pictures of Pokémon characters and common British species, such as badgers and oak trees. Children aged 8 could name 80 per cent of Pokémon characters, but they could identify only half the plants and animals (Science, vol 295, p 2367). Unless kids get more clued up about nature, says team member Tim Coulson, they won’t be enthusiastic about conservation as adults. “Maybe an animal version of Pokémon could help,” he says.…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Environment
First test of CO2 removal with green sand finds no harm to marine life
News

Space
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
News

Environment
Cleaning up air pollution could weaken vital AMOC ocean current
News

ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
2
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
3
Neanderthals treated a dental cavity by drilling into the tooth
4
Asteroid set to fly very close to Earth
5
Rebooting stem cells builds aged muscles and assists injury recovery
6
The profound effect the heart-brain connection has on your health
7
First test of CO2 removal with green sand finds no harm to marine life
8
Vocal fry is more common in men, actually, find scientists
9
PCOS has been officially renamed PMOS, and it’s a momentous move
10
Arctic fires are releasing carbon stored for thousands of years