STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
The relationship recession is even bigger for Gen Z than we thought
News

Technology
Killer robots are here – we must finally decide whether to accept them
Leader

Technology
Quantum computer quickly mines cryptocurrency while using less energy
News

Mind
How to sparkle in conversation with strangers
Comment
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
The relationship recession is even bigger for Gen Z than we thought
3
Understanding anorexia’s grip on the brain could unlock new therapies
4
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
5
The asteroid Ryugu has all of the main ingredients for life
6
Hundreds of new moons are revealing our solar system's violent history
7
Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything
8
Mirror life: Scientists clash over threat of lab-engineered bacteria
9
Why you need to future-proof your brain in middle age and how to start
10
Your brain undergoes four dramatic periods of change from age 0 to 90