Doctors and patients are being misled by the results of drug trials published in major international medical journals. According to a new analysis, reports on trials designed to find out how well a drug prevents strokes or heart attack, for example, include only the most flattering statistics, which makes a drug or procedure seem more effective than it actually is. Of 359 articles published between 1989 and 1998 in five major journals, all included a relative measure of how the drug reduces health risks, say Jim Nuovo and Joy Melnikow at the University of California, Davis. But only eight reported…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Life
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
News

Environment
First test of CO2 removal with green sand finds no harm to marine life
News

Space
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
News

Environment
Cleaning up air pollution could weaken vital AMOC ocean current
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Rebooting stem cells builds aged muscles and assists injury recovery
2
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
3
Neanderthals treated a dental cavity by drilling into the tooth
4
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
5
First test of CO2 removal with green sand finds no harm to marine life
6
Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer
7
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
8
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first
9
The mathematician who doesn’t exist
10
Vocal fry is more common in men, actually, find scientists