NEARLY seven years after the anthrax attacks that killed five people, the US Department of Justice appears to believe we may soon have a satisfactory account of who committed them. The apparent suicide last week of Bruce Ivins, head of the programme to improve anthrax vaccine at the in Frederick, Maryland, has triggered speculation that he was about to be charged for the attacks (see “Anthrax genes point to perpetrator”). It has also fostered accusations that by pouring money into biodefence research and giving more scientists access to hazardous materials, Washington…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Environment
2026 will be the hottest year on record, leading scientist predicts
News

Technology
NHS England rushes to hide software over AI hacking fears
News

ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
Comment

Life
Oak trees use delaying tactics to thwart hungry caterpillars
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
We have figured out a new way to send messages into the past
2
100-year-old assumption about the universe may soon be overturned
3
Human heads have changed shape a lot in the past 100 years
4
We may finally have a cure for many different autoimmune conditions
5
Weird 'transdimensional' state of matter is neither 2D nor 3D
6
Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?
7
We’ve glimpsed before the big bang and it’s not what we expected
8
The 4 biggest myths about hydration, according to an expert
9
The rings of Uranus are even stranger than we thought
10
Why the keto diet could be a revolutionary way to treat mental illness