IT’S a shame when the demands of the media overshadow those of science. The closely managed razzmatazz that accompanied the debut of Ida – the fossil “that could change everything” about our ancestry – ensured that everyone was talking about her for a day or two. But it also meant that no one was allowed to see the relevant paper until after the event, so there was little chance to seek disinterested comment on the researchers’ claim (see “What you should know about chiropractic”). By the time doubts about Ida’s role in our past emerged, the circus had moved on.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
The race to understand how and when Thwaites glacier will collapse
3
Babies are born with the neural foundations for maths
4
I’m the first person whose life was saved by CRISPR base editing
5
The best sci-fi novel in 2026 so far – plus 6 other great reads
6
Childbirth for many primate species is even harder than for humans
7
US government wants to have a useful quantum computer by 2028
8
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
9
We’ve uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
10
Remote-controlled cockroach swarm can now breathe underwater
