ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ

Leader and Humans

Understanding the Denisovans means understanding ourselves

Categorising the Denisovans as a distinct species would allow us to more comprehensively trace our own evolutionary development

By New Scientist

27 August 2025

Illustration of a teenage girl who is the offspring of a Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) mother and Denisovan (Homo sapiens denisova) father. A bone fragment with this hybrid ancestry was found in the Denisova Cave in Russia. The bone belonged to a female who was at least 13 years old and died around 90,000 years ago. It was known from genetic analysis of other fossils that the two species had interbred, but this is the first first-generation offspring of such a pairing to be found.

Ohn Bavaro Fine Art/Science Photo Library

Today we are alone. But just a few hundred thousand years ago, our ancestors shared the world with at least five other ancient human species, including diminutive hobbits and burly Neanderthals.

It may now be time to add to that list. As we report in “An incredible Denisovan skull is upending the story of human evolution”, there are growing calls to give species status to a group of ancient humans known as the Denisovans.

This is hardly a rushed decision, given that the first Denisovan fossils were identified 15 years ago. Ancient DNA extracted from these remains revealed that they belonged to humans with a discrete evolutionary history. But it also suggested that these mysterious ancient people had , leaving many researchers reluctant to consider them a separate species.

However, some definitions of a species allow for interbreeding, as long as the species involved maintain a defined appearance. The problem was that we didn’t yet know what Denisovans looked like. But earlier this year, we learned that an unusually thickset ancient skull, unearthed in China, is associated with Denisovan DNA. With the confirmation that the Denisovans were distinct in appearance, it is easier to argue that they should be given a formal species name.

It is possible that the Denisovans could help us work out why we were the last humans standing

Biologists’ desire to divide nature up into species is sometimes dismissed as mere , where the aim is to categorise organisms rather than truly understand them. But in this case, at least, there is value to the exercise. Anatomical evidence from the Denisovan fossils points to the intriguing possibility that these enigmatic humans were very closely related to our species – perhaps, in fact, more closely related than any other. That suggests we might gain a particularly clear insight into the early behavioural development of Homo sapiens by comparing them with the Denisovans.

At some point, our ancestors learned new behaviours that helped them outcompete all other human species. It is just possible that the Denisovans could help us work out how we came to be the last humans standing.

Topics:

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop