Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
20 April 2005
From Reginald T. Cahill, Flinders University
Contrary to the claims in your cover story regarding the need for gas-filled cavities in the Michelson interferometer (2 April, p 30), the paper first reporting this discovery was by Kirsty Kitto and myself. It was published in Apeiron (vol 10, p 104). Most significantly, the speeds of some 8 kilometres per second from various …
20 April 2005
From Rick Relyea, University of Pittsburgh
In response to my finding that the herbicide Roundup may be lethal to amphibians (9 April, p 5), Monsanto has created a web page criticising my study at www.monsanto.co.uk/news/ukshowlib.phtml?uid=8800 . Readers may like to know that there is also now a web page that addresses Monsanto's concerns at www.pitt.edu/~relyea/Roundup.html .
20 April 2005
From David O. Carpenter, Institute for ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ and the Environment, University at Albany
Your report on the US's proposed study of the effects of Agent Orange contains comments attributed to me implying something that is not true – that the cancellation of this study was in any way related to the ongoing litigation (19 March, p 7). The study was cancelled solely because 18 months after it had …
20 April 2005
From Josephine Quintavalle
Comment on Reproductive Ethics A. C. Grayling predictably asserts the virtues of libertarianism in the field of assisted reproduction (9 April, p 17). But pigeon-holing opposition as a religious minority does no credit to his arguments. The UK House of Commons science and technology select committee did indeed consult broadly on the issues of IVF …