ÎçÒ¹¸£Àû1000¼¯ºÏ

Letter: Hunting for jobs

Published 11 September 1999

From Nigel Burke

Your editorial was correct to say that banning fox hunting would increase
rural unemployment
(17 July, p 3).
Between fifteen and sixteen thousand jobs
depend on hunting. This is not a guess; the figures are from Countryside
Sports: Their Economic, Social and Conservation Significance, the 1997
report by Cobham Resource Consultants, a firm whose clients include the World
Bank, the European Union and Britain’s Countryside Agency.

The recent letter from the International Fund for Animal Welfare cited a
report by economist Neil Ward as concluding that “large numbers of jobs will
automatically be lost following a ban” (14 August, p 56). However, it failed to
reproduce Ward’s italicised emphasis on the word “automatically”. This
considerably changes the sense of Ward’s conclusions.

nigel-burke@countryside-alliance.org

Issue no. 2203 published 11 September 1999

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop